Publications

What is a Publication?
216 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 216

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: Only small amounts of data are available on the prescription frequency of physical therapies (PT) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate prescription frequencies of PT considering functional status and sociodemographic factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 98,963 adults diagnosed with RA in 2013 were identified in claims data from the BARMER health insurance. A questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 6193 people requesting information on the disease status. Of these 2535 persons were included who agreed to the linking of the questionnaire and claims data and who confirmed a diagnosis of RA. From the routine claims data the prescription of PT and occupational therapy as well as the medical discipline of the prescribing physician were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine which variables (age, sex, M05/M06 diagnosis, residential area, income, functional status and rheumatological care) were associated with the use of PT. RESULTS: In 2015 a total of 47% of the study population received PT (35% physiotherapy, 15% thermotherapy, 15% manual therapy, 2% electrotherapy and 6% massage) and 3% occupational therapy. Of the PT prescriptions 37% were issued by general practitioners, 27% by orthopedists and 18% by rheumatologists. Women and persons living in the eastern states of Germany and patients with high functional impairment were prescribed PT more often. Income, educational status, seropositivity and rheumatological care did not have any influence on the frequency of prescription of PT. CONCLUSION: There are deficits in the outpatient prescription of PT but without indications of an undersupply of population groups due to low socioeconomic status. In contrast to the prescription of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment, PT is predominantly prescribed by general practitioners.

Authors: H. Jacobs, J. Callhoff, F. Hoffmann, A. Zink, K. Albrecht

Date Published: 2019

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of comorbidities in a population-based cohort of persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to matched controls and to examine their association with patient-reported outcomes in a survey sample. METHODS: Data of 96,921 persons with RA [International Classification of Diseases, 10th ed (ICD-10) M05/M06] and 484,605 age- and sex-matched controls without RA of a German statutory health fund were studied regarding 26 selected comorbidities (ICD-10). A self-reported questionnaire, comprising joint counts [(tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC)], functional status (Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire), effect of the disease (Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease), and well-being (World Health Organization 5-item Well-Being Index; WHO-5) was sent to a random sample of 6193 persons with RA, of whom 3184 responded. For respondents who confirmed their RA (n = 2535), associations between comorbidities and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed by multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Compared to controls, all investigated comorbidities were more frequent in persons with RA (mean age 63 yrs, 80% female). In addition to cardiovascular risk factors, the most common were osteoarthritis (44% vs 21%), depression (32% vs 20%), and osteoporosis (26% vs 9%). Among the survey respondents, 87% of those with 0-1 comorbidity but only 77% of those with >/= 8 comorbidities were treated by rheumatologists. Increasing numbers of comorbidities were associated with poorer values for TJC, SJC, function, and WHO-5. CONCLUSION: Compared to a matched population, persons with RA present with increased prevalence of numerous comorbidities. Patients with RA and multimorbidity are at risk of insufficient rheumatological care and poorer patient-reported outcomes.

Authors: A. Luque Ramos, I. Redeker, F. Hoffmann, J. Callhoff, A. Zink, K. Albrecht

Date Published: 2019

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) that incorporate the patient perspective have not been well established in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). As part of our goal to develop IIM-specific PROM, the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Myositis special interest group sought to determine which aspects of disease and its effects are important to patients and healthcare providers (HCP). METHODS: Based on a prior qualitative content analysis of focus groups, an initial list of 24 candidate domains was constructed. We subsequently conducted an international survey to identify the importance of each of the 24 domains to be assessed in clinical research. Patients with IIM, their caregivers, and HCP treating IIM completed the survey. RESULTS: In this survey, a total of 638 respondents completed the survey, consisting of 510 patients, 101 HCP, and 27 caregivers from 48 countries. Overall, patients were more likely to rank "fatigue," "cognitive impact," and "difficulty sleeping" higher compared with HCP, who ranked "joint symptoms," "lung symptoms," and "dysphagia" higher. Both patients and providers rated muscle symptoms as their top domain. In general, patients from different countries were in agreement on which domains were most important. One notable exception was that patients from Sweden and the Netherlands ranked lung symptoms significantly higher compared to other countries including the United States and Australia (mean weighted rankings of 2.86 and 2.04 vs 0.76 and 0.80, respectively; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Substantial differences exist in how IIM is perceived by patients compared to HCP, with different domains prioritized. In contrast, patients’ ratings across the world were largely similar.

Authors: C. A. Mecoli, J. K. Park, H. Alexanderson, M. Regardt, M. Needham, I. de Groot, C. Sarver, I. E. Lundberg, B. Shea, M. de Visser, Y. W. Song, C. O. Bingham, L. Christopher-Stine

Date Published: 2019

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To present and vote on a myositis modified patient-reported outcome core domain set in the life impact area at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 2018. METHODS: Based on results from international focus groups and Delphi surveys, a draft core set was developed. RESULTS: Domains muscle symptoms, fatigue, level of physical activity, and pain reached >/= 70% consensus and were mandatory to assess in all trials. Domains lung, joint, and skin symptoms were mandatory in specific circumstances. This core set was endorsed by > 85% at OMERACT 2018. CONCLUSION: We propose a life impact core set for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and will proceed with instrument selections.

Authors: M. Regardt, C. A. Mecoli, J. K. Park, I. de Groot, C. Sarver, M. Needham, M. de Visser, B. Shea, C. O. Bingham, I. E. Lundberg, Y. W. Song, L. Christopher-Stine, H. Alexanderson

Date Published: 2019

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

The prevalence of primary Sjogren’s syndrome (pSS) is between 1:100 and 1:1000 and it is therefore the most common connective tissue disease. Nevertheless, it can be difficult to diagnose pSS as the symptoms are frequently unspecific and diagnostic markers are lacking in many patients. In addition, only few controlled therapeutic studies of pSS have been carried out so that the optimal management is not yet clear. Meanwhile, outcome parameters to monitor clinical improvement have been developed and a large number of therapeutic studies are currently being performed. This review article summarizes the current diagnostic and treatment options for pSS.

Author: T. Witte

Date Published: 2019

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of indicators of unfavorable prognosis ("poor prognostic factors") on the achievement of low disease activity (LDA)/remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Biologic DMARD-naive patients with RA from three observational cohorts were examined. N = 713 patients started their 1st csDMARD, n = 1613 switched to the 2nd csDMARD and n = 388 to the 1st TNF-inhibitor. High disease activity (DAS28 > 5.1), autoantibodies (RF/ACPA positive), prevalent erosions, functional limitation (HAQ >/= 1.2), comorbidities, obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m(2)), and smoking were evaluated as prognostic factors. Generalized regression analyses were applied to investigate prognostic factors regarding the achievement of LDA (DAS28 < 3.2) or remission (DAS28 < 2.6) within six months. RESULTS: At baseline, RF/ACPA positivity was most frequent in all cohorts (60.3-75.3%), followed by DAS28 > 5.1 (35-57.7%), HAQ >/= 1.2 (40.5-52.5%), >/= 2 comorbidities (31.4-54.1%) and erosions (17.1-46.1%). Remission was achieved by 39% (1st-csDMARD), 26% (2nd-csDMARD) and 30% (1st-TNFi). In adjusted regression models DAS28 > 5.1 (OR: 0.41 [0.30;0.56]), HAQ >/= 1.2 (0.56 [0.42;0.74]), current smoking (0.72 [0.53;0.97], obesity (0.66 [0.49;0.89] and >/= 2 comorbidities (0.57 [0.40;0.80]) were independently associated with a lower chance to achieve remission within six months (ORs for 2nd-csDMARD). The proportion of patients in LDA/remission declined by 6-12%-points if DAS28 > 5.1 was present at baseline and by 15-27%-points if functional limitation, comorbidities and obesity were additionally present. In all cohorts RF/ACPA positivity and erosions were not associated with achieving LDA/remission. CONCLUSIONS: While RF/ACPA status and erosions do not affect the achievement of LDA/remission, high disease activity, functional limitation, comorbidities and obesity should be considered as unfavorable prognostic factors in patients starting the 1st or 2nd DMARD strategy.

Authors: L. Baganz, A. Richter, K. Albrecht, M. Schneider, G. R. Burmester, A. Zink, A. Strangfeld

Date Published: 2019

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) represents the most common form of primary systemic vasculitis and is frequently associated with comorbidities related to the disease itself or induced by the treatment. Systematically collected data on disease course, treatment and outcomes of GCA remain scarce. The aim of this EULAR Task Force was to identify a core set of items which can easily be collected by experienced clinicians, in order to facilitate collaborative research into the course and outcomes of GCA. A multidisciplinary EULAR task force group of 20 experts including rheumatologists, internists, epidemiologists and patient representatives was assembled. During a 1-day meeting, breakout groups discussed items from a previously compiled collection of parameters describing GCA status and disease course. Feedback from breakout groups was further discussed. Final consensus was achieved by means of several rounds of email discussions after the meeting. A three-round Delphi survey was conducted to determine a core set of parameters including the level of agreement. 117 parameters were regarded as relevant. Potential items were subdivided into the following categories: General, demographics, GCA-related signs and symptoms, other medical conditions and treatment. Possible instruments and assessment intervals were proposed for documentation of each item. To facilitate implementation of the recommendations in clinical care and clinical research, a minimum core set of 50 parameters was agreed. This proposed core set intends to ensure that relevant items from different GCA registries and databases can be compared for the dual purposes of facilitating clinical research and improving clinical care.

Authors: L. Ehlers, J. Askling, H. W. Bijlsma, M. C. Cid, M. Cutolo, B. Dasgupta, C. Dejaco, W. G. Dixon, N. Feltelius, A. Finckh, K. Gilbert, S. L. Mackie, A. Mahr, E. L. Matteson, L. Neill, C. Salvarani, W. A. Schmidt, A. Strangfeld, R. F. van Vollenhoven, F. Buttgereit

Date Published: 2019

Publication Type: Journal

Powered by
(v.1.17.3)

(LDH: v0.3.4)

Copyright © 2008 - 2023 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Additions copyright ...