Publications

What is a Publication?
216 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 216
The national database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres: I. Structure, aims, and patients

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To describe the aims, principles, and content of the German rheumatological database and to present data on patient mix and healthcare provision for the year 1998. METHODS: The German … rheumatological database contains clinical and patient derived data of the outpatients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases seen at one of the 24 collaborative arthritis centres. The case mix, institutional context, and demographic features of 25 653 patients from the year 1998 were analysed. RESULTS: 51% of the patients had rheumatoid arthritis, 23% seronegative spondyloarthropathies, including ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and reactive arthritis, and 19% had vasculitis, including SLE (5%). The distribution of the age at onset of patients with RA with < or = 2 years’ disease duration was comparable with recent incidence data from population studies. The case mix differed between university departments and rheumatology hospitals as well as individual practices. 65% of the male and 46% of the female patients at ages 18-60 were still in gainful employment, the rates of employment were 14% below the population rates for women, and 11% below those for men. 62% of all patients had seen a rheumatologist within the first year of disease, 73% within the first two years. Ankylosing spondylitis was seen in rheumatological care much later than all other diseases (only 39% within the first year). The mean number of contacts with a rheumatologist was five a year; rheumatologists in individual practices saw their patients seven times a year on the average. Together with visits to the non-specialist doctor mainly treating the patient, the mean number of visits to the doctor for a rheumatic condition was 20 a year. CONCLUSION: Large databases like this one give information about the patient case mix in different healthcare settings, about treatment practice, and about the consequences of disease. Patients treated in specialised rheumatology units in Germany are referred earlier than in the past, which probably reflects better regional cooperation due to the implementation of arthritis centres. University departments and outpatient clinics of rheumatology hospitals contribute considerably to the specialised care of patients with arthritis and connective tissue diseases.

Authors: A. Zink, J. Listing, C. Klindworth, H. Zeidler, Centres German Collaboratrive Arthritis

Date Published: 2001

Publication Type: Journal

The national database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres: II. Treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To describe current treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in German rheumatology. METHODS: Data from the German rheumatological database of 1998, comprising clinical and patient … questionnaire data of 12 992 outpatients with RA seen at 24 collaborative arthritis centres in Germany, were analysed. RESULTS: At the time of documentation, 88% of the patients with RA were undergoing disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment. Methotrexate (MTX) was prescribed to 56% of the patients (61% with seropositive and 45% with seronegative RA). Combination treatment was used in 15%. MTX was the drug of first choice even in patients with up to one year’s disease duration (49%), followed by antimalarial drugs (21%). Patients treated by non-rheumatologists within the previous year had received DMARD treatment in only 33% of the cases. In steroid treatment, low doses (< or = 7.5 mg/day) were used by rheumatologists much more often (44%) than higher doses (12%). 16% of the patients had been inpatients during the previous year, with a median length of stay accumulated over the year of 21 days. Together with stays in inpatient rehabilitation, 22% of all patients had had some form of inpatient treatment. Comprehensive measures such as occupational therapy and patient education were prescribed to fewer than 12% of the patients, mostly during their hospital stay. CONCLUSION: German rheumatologists do follow recent recommendations about early and effective treatment. However, there are still deficits in outpatient care with non-medicinal measures like occupational therapy and patient education, which may partly explain the high hospital admission rates.

Authors: A. Zink, J. Listing, M. Niewerth, H. Zeidler, Centres German Collaborative Arthritis

Date Published: 2001

Publication Type: Journal

Practice variation in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis among German rheumatologists

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To describe practice variation in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) among German rheumatologists with regard to drug and non-drug therapy. METHODS: We used data of 7,326 patients … with RA registered in a national German rheumatological database in 1998. In the database, every patient with an inflammatory rheumatic disease seen at one of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres is registered once a year with a standard clinical data form and a patient questionnaire. We compared health care provided by 29 rheumatological outpatient units. For drug and non-drug treatment unit prescription rates, ranges and outliers were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used for case mix adjustment and for the identification of practice patterns. RESULTS: We observed variation concerning the frequency of use of single disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). The median of the prescription rates in the 29 units for methotrexate (MTX) was 55% in 1998 (1st quartile: 51%, 3rd quartile: 63%); sulfasalazine had a median of 15% (quartiles: 10%/19%), antimalarials a median of 8% (quartiles: 5%/21%). Combination DMARD therapy was used in 11% (quartiles: 6%/18%). Prescriptions of low dose steroids (< or = 7.5 mg) had a median of 45% (quartiles: 35%/55%), and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) had a median prescription rate of 58% (quartiles: 50%/70%). High variation was also found concerning active physiotherapy (median: 41%; quartiles 34%/55%) and passive physical measures (median 14%, quartiles 9%/37%). Differences in case mix (age, sex, rheumatoid factor, disease duration, severity, disability) only explained a small proportion of the total variation. When the units were grouped according to the frequency of prescription of DMARD combination therapy, treatment patterns could be identified. Units with higher rates of DMARD combination therapy used more drugs for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, more active physiotherapy but fewer NSAID and fewer passive physical therapies. CONCLUSION: Variation in drug and non-drug treatment indicates significant differences in health care provision. Trends in the drug management of RA are adopted differentially by the members of the rheumatology community. The large variability in non-drug therapies may, apart from differences in availability, suggest a lack of agreement on therapeutic effectiveness.

Authors: A. Zink, J. Listing, S. Ziemer, H. Zeidler, Centres German Collaborative Arthritis

Date Published: 2001

Publication Type: Journal

[Contribution of databases to regional and supra-regional quality improvement in rheumatologic treatment and patient management. Professional Society of Regional Cooperative Rheumatic Disease Centers]

Abstract (Expand)

The uniform database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centers is an important instrument for health services research, the observation of outcomes of daily rheumatological care, and for quality … assessment in rheumatology. Deficits concerning modern medical and comprehensive therapy in non-specialized outpatient care were shown. The data give evidence of the benefits of the initiation of rheumatological care. Data of practice variation in rheumatology are used for internal quality assessment.

Author: A. Zink

Date Published: 1998

Publication Type: Journal

Incidence and prevalence of juvenile chronic arthritis in East Berlin 1980-88

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and prevalence rates of juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). METHODS: The study population was children under 16 years of age living in the East Berlin area (part of … the former German Democratic Republic). By admission order that was effective up to 1990, all children with symptoms of a rheumatic disease living in the East Berlin area had to be referred to the 2nd Children’s Hospital at Berlin-Buch. This specific condition allowed us to ascertain cases from the clinical records and to calculate population rates. Based upon this data, the results of surveys with different methods of case ascertainment are compared. RESULTS: An incidence rate of 3.5 per 100,000 and a prevalence rate of 2.0 per 10,000 children were calculated. The frequency of JCA is higher for girls, with an incidence of 4.3 per 100,000 and a prevalence of 2.3 per 10,000. The figures for boys are 2.7 per 100,000 and 1.7 per 10,000, respectively. CONCLUSION: Because of the specific prerequisites, the population rates of prevalence and incidence that were based on clinical records can be regarded as valid in this study. Deviant results of other surveys can be explained by differences in the study design or in the diagnostic procedures used.

Authors: U. Kiessling, E. Doring, J. Listing, J. Meincke, M. Schontube, A. Strangfeld, A. Zink

Date Published: 1998

Publication Type: Journal

[Comparative evaluation of a German version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire and the Hannover Functional Capacity Questionnaire]

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To translate the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ) into a German version, to validate and to compare its properties with two different versions of the Hannover Functional … Ability Questionnaire (HFAQ) in a German speaking population. METHODS: The test-retest reliability was tested by Pearson correlation in 32 outpatients of the Department of Rheumatology of the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. For retesting, the questionnaire was mailed to them 1 week later. To validate the questionnaire it was administered to 110 inpatients in three different hospitals. All patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology 1987 revised criteria of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or the Rome criteria of definitive inactive RA. The internal consistency was measured by Cronbach’s coefficient alpha (CCA). To assess criterion validity we compared the HAQ and the two versions of the HFAQ with Keitel’s test (KT) and the modified Steinbrocker classification (mSC). Construct validity was assessed by comparing these instruments with different clinical and laboratory variables. A multivariate analysis was used to identify the most important factors that are influencing the HAQ- and HFAQ-scores. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability of the HAQ was r = 0.94. CCA was 0.91 (HAQ), 0.90 (HFAQ-P) and 0.93 (HFAQ-PR). The KT Pearson correlation coefficients reached r = -0.73 (HAQ), r = +0.74 (HFAQ-P) and r = +0.71 (HFAQ-PR). The mSC correlated r = +0.75 (HAQ), r = -0.72 (HFAQ-P) and r = -0.70 (HFAQ-PR). The correlation coefficients of HAQ/HFAQ-P was r = -0.87 and of HAQ/HFAQ-PR r = -0.88. The correlations between other clinical and laboratory variables reached from r = +/-0.58 (pain/HAQ) to r = +/-0.11 (number of swollen joints/HFAQ-PR). In backward multiple regression analysis 59-64% of the variance of disability measured by the questionnaires was explained predominantly by pain (32-33%) and by range of motion (16-21%). CONCLUSION: The German version of the HAQ presented here and the two versions of the HFAQ are reliable and valid instruments for measuring functional disability in a German-speaking population with RA. The construct measured by the HAQ and both versions of the HFAQ showed a high degree of correspondence.

Authors: J. Lautenschlager, W. Mau, T. Kohlmann, H. H. Raspe, F. Struve, W. Bruckle, H. Zeidler

Date Published: 1997

Publication Type: Misc

Powered by
 (v.1.17.3)

(LDH: v0.3.4)

About NFDI4Health | About Local Data Hub DRFZ Berlin | Partners and Funding | Credits | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Imprint
Copyright © 2008 - 2023 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Additions copyright ...