Publications

What is a Publication?
213 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 213
[The National Database of the German Arthritis Centres–a 12 year balance]

Abstract (Expand)

The National Database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres is the most important source for the evaluation of current health care for German rheumatology patients. Since 1993, all outpatients … with inflammatory rheumatic diseases treated in one of 24 arthritis centres have been recorded once a year using a clinical record form and a patient questionnaire. The aim is to gain knowledge on the outcomes and the medical, social and economic consequences of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in the real world, and to monitor continuously the current state and trends in health care. Data from more than 200,000 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases from 11 years (1993-2003) are available, making it possible to analyse even very rare diseases with a sufficient numbers of cases. Selected results on the health care situation, practice variation in rheumatology and the burden of illness in various diseases are reported.

Authors: A. Zink, D. Huscher, M. Schneider

Date Published: 2006

Publication Type: Journal

Healthcare and burden of disease in psoriatic arthritis. A comparison with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To compare quality of life and treatment among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated by German rheumatologists. METHODS: … Data for outpatients with PsA (n = 1863), RA (n = 9627), or AS (n = 1378) enrolled in the national database of the German collaborative arthritis centers in the year 2002 were analyzed. Among those with PsA, 2 subgroups with predominantly peripheral arthritis (n = 1612) and predominantly axial disease (n = 251) were distinguished. RESULTS: We found a high burden of illness in patients with PsA treated by rheumatologists. Among the 2 subgroups, those with axial PsA had worse outcomes (pain, function) than those with peripheral PsA. However, compared with RA and AS, physician ratings of disease activity and severity were lower in PsA. Concerning access to rheumatology care, there were similarities between AS and axial PsA, with very long disease duration at first visit (mean of about 6 yrs), versus RA and peripheral PsA, with shorter duration (1.6 and 2.5 yrs, respectively). A majority (84%) of patients with PsA were treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. Thirty percent of the patients with PsA currently were under therapy with glucocorticoids, mainly (89%) with a dose < 7.5 mg. CONCLUSION: Patients with PsA seen in rheumatologic care have a burden of illness comparable to that of patients with RA or AS.

Authors: A. Zink, K. Thiele, D. Huscher, J. Listing, J. Sieper, A. Krause, E. Gromnica-Ihle, U. von Hinueber, S. Wassenberg, E. Genth, M. Schneider, Centres German Collaborative Arthritis

Date Published: 2006

Publication Type: Journal

Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low–results from RABBIT, the German biologics register

Abstract (Expand)

We investigated the frequency of remission according to the disease activity score (DAS28) definition, modified American Rheumatology Association (ARA) criteria, and the frequency of an achievement of … a functional status above defined thresholds (’functional remission’, ’physical independence’) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with either biologics or conventional DMARDs. We used the data of a prospective cohort study, the German biologics register RABBIT (German acronym for Rheumatoid Arthritis–Observation of Biologic Therapy) to investigate the outcomes in RA patients with two or more DMARD failures who received new treatment with biologics (BIOL; n = 818) or a conventional DMARD (n = 265). Logistic regression analysis was applied to adjust for differences in baseline risks. Taking risk indicators such as previous DMARD failures or baseline clinical status into account, we found that biologics doubled the chance of remission compared to conventional DMARD therapies (DAS28 remission, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.95 (95% confidenece interval (CI) 1.2-3.2)); ARA remission, OR 2.05 (95% CI 1.2-3.5)). High remission rates (DAS28 remission, 30.6%; ARA remission, 16.9%) were observed in BIOL patients with a moderate disease activity (DAS28, 3.2 to 5.1) at the start of treatment. These rates decreased to 8.5% in patients with DAS28 > 6. Sustained remission at 6 and 12 months was achieved in <10% of the patients. Severely disabled patients (< or = 50% of full function) receiving biologic therapies were significantly more likely to achieve a status indicating physical independence (> or = 67% of full function) than controls (OR 3.88 (95% CI 1.7-8.8)). ’Functional remission’ (> or = 83% of full function) was more often achieved in BIOL than in controls (OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.04-4.6)). In conclusion, our study shows that biologics increase the chance to achieve clinical remission and a status of functional remission or at least physical independence. However, temporary or even sustained remission remain ambitious aims, which are achieved in a minority of patients only.

Authors: J. Listing, A. Strangfeld, R. Rau, J. Kekow, E. Gromnica-Ihle, T. Klopsch, W. Demary, G. R. Burmester, A. Zink

Date Published: 2006

Publication Type: Journal

[Dose adjustment in patients treated with infliximab in routine rheumatologic care in Germany. Results from the Biologics Register RABBIT]

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: Data from international observational studies show that a considerable proportion of patients use higher dosages of infliximab (INF) than the usual 3 mg every 8 weeks used in Germany for … treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The Data are, however, inconsistent and vary between countries. Using data from the German Biologics Register RABBIT we investigated: (1) how dosage of INF develops during the first year of treatment in routine care, and (2) how dosage translates into clinical effectiveness. PATIENTS: We analysed data from 344 patients who started a treatment with INF at their inclusion into the register and who were observed for the subsequent 12 months. Mean dosage at 3 months (after the loading dose) was 3.2 mg/kg body weight/infusion and 3.3 mg/kg after 1 year. If we also consider shortening the infusion intervals, the mean dosages at the start and after 1 year were 4.0 mg/kg body weight every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Patients who were treated with low dosages of up to 3 mg/kg/8 weeks showed significantly less improvement (EULAR response) than those who were treated with higher dosages. CONCLUSIONS: The data show that German rheumatologists are aware of the high costs of treatment and try to use the lowest possible dosage. However, for a certain proportion of the patients this might be insufficient.

Authors: A. Zink, J. Listing, A. Strangfeld, E. Gromnica-Ihle, W. Demary, M. Schneider

Date Published: 2006

Publication Type: Journal

Effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis in an observational cohort study: comparison of patients according to their eligibility for major randomized clinical trials

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluate the efficacy of treatments in selected groups of patients defined by strict inclusion criteria. The value of these trials in predicting therapeutic … effectiveness in "real world" patients is limited. This observational cohort study was designed to complement the knowledge obtained in RCTs by evaluating the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to their eligibility for the major trials. METHODS: Using the data from the German biologics register Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT [in German]), we investigated how many of the RA patients who were treated with a TNF inhibitor (infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab) would have been eligible for the major clinical trials that led to approval of the drugs. In addition, therapeutic effectiveness was compared in the eligible and ineligible patients using the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) and 50% (ACR50) improvement response criteria. RESULTS: Only 21-33% of the patients in the RABBIT register would have been eligible for the major trials. In these patients, the ACR20 and ACR50 improvement responses, indicating therapeutic effectiveness, were comparable with the response rates in the published trials. ACR response rates were lower in those patients considered ineligible for the trials; however, absolute improvement was similar to that in eligible patients. Ineligible patients had lower baseline disease activity, more comorbidity, and lower functional status. CONCLUSION: RCT cohorts reflect only a minor proportion of the patients treated with biologic agents in routine care. In the clinic setting, the indications for treatment with biologic agents are not identical to the inclusion criteria for trials. Despite the smaller relative improvement achieved in these patients with longstanding, severe RA who would not fulfill the inclusion criteria of a major trial, the majority of such patients would nevertheless benefit from biologic therapy.

Authors: A. Zink, A. Strangfeld, M. Schneider, P. Herzer, F. Hierse, M. Stoyanova-Scholz, S. Wassenberg, A. Kapelle, J. Listing

Date Published: 2006

Publication Type: Journal

Employment across chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases and comparison with the general population

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To compare labor force participation across chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases in order to assess the influence of the disease, disease duration, sex, education, and labor market … conditions on employment. METHODS: Data from the German rheumatological database on outpatients of working age (20-59 yrs) between 1993 and 2001 were analyzed. The patients had rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 26,071), ankylosing spondylitis (AS; n = 5564), psoriatic arthritis (PsA; n = 6041), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; n = 4603), systemic sclerosis (SSc; n = 802), or Wegener’s granulomatosis (WG; n = 385). Using population data, standardized employment ratios (SER) and part-time employment ratios of observed versus expected cases with 95% CI were calculated by means of indirect standardization for age and year of documentation. RESULTS: Across all diseases the overall employment rates were significantly lower than in the general population. Significant differences in SER were found between the diseases. The lowest SER of 0.76 to 0.81 (1.0 = population) were found in patients with RA, SLE, SSc, and WG. Higher SER were seen in AS (0.94) and PsA (0.92). In patients with a disease duration > 10 years the relative risk of being employed compared to RA, was 1.42 for AS, 1.26 for PsA, and 1.15, 1.03, 0.62 for PsA, SLE, SSc and WG, respectively. Comparing areas with low and high unemployment rates, a highly significant influence of labor market conditions on the SER was observed. The SER were significantly lower in patients with < 10 years of school education. CONCLUSION: Differences between employment rates in the population and the rates for the diseases under study are smaller than assumed by most clinical studies, especially in AS and PsA. However, these differences increase with longer disease duration. Specific measures to prevent patients from losing their job are needed, especially in areas with overall high unemployment.

Authors: W. Mau, J. Listing, D. Huscher, H. Zeidler, A. Zink

Date Published: 2005

Publication Type: Journal

Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVES: Implementation of the International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) coding system presents challenges for using administrative data. … Recognizing this, we conducted a multistep process to develop ICD-10 coding algorithms to define Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in administrative data and assess the performance of the resulting algorithms. METHODS: ICD-10 coding algorithms were developed by "translation" of the ICD-9-CM codes constituting Deyo’s (for Charlson comorbidities) and Elixhauser’s coding algorithms and by physicians’ assessment of the face-validity of selected ICD-10 codes. The process of carefully developing ICD-10 algorithms also produced modified and enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithms for the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities. We then used data on in-patients aged 18 years and older in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative hospital discharge data from a Canadian health region to assess the comorbidity frequencies and mortality prediction achieved by the original ICD-9-CM algorithms, the enhanced ICD-9-CM algorithms, and the new ICD-10 coding algorithms. RESULTS: Among 56,585 patients in the ICD-9-CM data and 58,805 patients in the ICD-10 data, frequencies of the 17 Charlson comorbidities and the 30 Elixhauser comorbidities remained generally similar across algorithms. The new ICD-10 and enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithms either matched or outperformed the original Deyo and Elixhauser ICD-9-CM coding algorithms in predicting in-hospital mortality. The C-statistic was 0.842 for Deyo’s ICD-9-CM coding algorithm, 0.860 for the ICD-10 coding algorithm, and 0.859 for the enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithm, 0.868 for the original Elixhauser ICD-9-CM coding algorithm, 0.870 for the ICD-10 coding algorithm and 0.878 for the enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: These newly developed ICD-10 and ICD-9-CM comorbidity coding algorithms produce similar estimates of comorbidity prevalence in administrative data, and may outperform existing ICD-9-CM coding algorithms.

Authors: H. Quan, V. Sundararajan, P. Halfon, A. Fong, B. Burnand, J. C. Luthi, L. D. Saunders, C. A. Beck, T. E. Feasby, W. A. Ghali

Date Published: 2005

Publication Type: Journal

Powered by
 (v.1.17.3)

(LDH: v0.3.4)

About NFDI4Health | About Local Data Hub DRFZ Berlin | Partners and Funding | Credits | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Imprint
Copyright © 2008 - 2023 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Additions copyright ...