Publications

What is a Publication?
213 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 213

Abstract (Expand)

According to the classification criteria of the American-European Consensus Group (AECG), the prevalence of primary Sjogren’s syndrome (pSS) of about 0.2% in the adult population and a yearly incidence of 4/100.000 in the general population are far lower than previously assumed. Moreover, the repeatedly reported male/female ratio of 1:9 seems to lie more in the range of 1:20. Male pSS patients show fewer immunological, histopathological or sialographic findings and organ involvement. Information on age at disease onset has also changed over the last decade. Recent studies indicate an onset age of approximately 45 years as compared to 56 in earlier studies of the last decade. Patients with an early disease onset are more frequently positive for rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-Ro/SS-A. These patients also seem to have a higher risk of developing hypocomplementemia or lymphadenopathy. As compared to earlier cohorts, the introduction of the rather specific AECG criteria will probably result in the participation of fewer men, younger patients in general and of more seriously ill patients in future cohorts. The change in the spectrum of pSS patients obviously reflects the altered classification criteria since the AECG criteria require anti-Ro/La positivity and therefore exclude a high number of patients with other immunological markers who also show severe sicca symptoms and organ involvements. About 5%-10% of pSS patients in rheumatological care suffer from severe extraglandular manifestations, which generally occur soon after disease onset. In particular, palpable purpura, hypocomplementemia, cryoglobulinemia and lymphoma are associated with increased mortality. In Germany, approximately one tenth of Sjogren syndrome patients receive specialized rheumatological care. There is still insufficient knowledge about the vast majority of pSS patients who are not treated by rheumatologists. These patients, as well as all those who, according to the AECG criteria, are not classified as having pSS either due to anti-Ro/La negativity or having secondary Sjogren’s syndrome, probably add up to at least 0.4% of the adult population which, at present, suffers from considerable immunopathologic sicca symptoms.

Authors: G. Westhoff, A. Zink

Date Published: 2010

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: New strategies and options for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have evolved during the past decade. A study was undertaken to investigate to what extent this influenced daily rheumatological care and how this translates into clinical and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Data from a total of 38 723 outpatients with RA enrolled in the National Database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres in the years 1997-2007 were analysed. The cross-sectional annual data were compared to detect time trends. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2007 the prescription of combinations of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) increased from 8% of all patients to 23%; biological agents were prescribed to 16% of patients with RA in 2007. The mean disease activity (DAS28) fell from 4.5 to 3.4 (median 4.5-3.2). The percentage of patients with low disease activity (DAS28 <3.2) increased significantly from 23% to 49%. The proportion of patients with >/=6 swollen joints fell from 43.1% in 1997 to 8.1% in 2007 and, in those with >/=6 tender joints, from 46.3% to 15.8%. There was a large decrease in the total annual number of days of sick leave due to the rheumatic condition from 27.2 to 8.8 days per gainfully employed person. This reduction is far beyond the decline in the general population. There was also a tendency to higher participation in the work force, specifically in older patients, reflecting the trend seen in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: The intensity of drug treatment in patients with RA has increased during the past 7 years. This has been accompanied by not only a decrease in disease activity but also a considerable reduction of economic losses due to sick leave and permanent work disability.

Authors: S. Ziegler, D. Huscher, K. Karberg, A. Krause, S. Wassenberg, A. Zink

Date Published: 2010

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

In 2005, the first evidence-based German guideline on the management of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was published. With data from the national database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres and other health care studies we evaluated to what extent current health care is in accordance with the guideline’s recommendations.A total of 66% of all newly referred RA patients seen at the national database centers in 2008 achieved the goal of seeing a rheumatologist within 3 months of symptom onset, while 75% were seen within 6 months. Before referral, 25% of the patients had DMARD therapy and 19% glucocorticoids. Of the patients in rheumatological care, 90% received DMARDs. The availability of early arthritis clinics determines the promptness of access to a rheumatologist.After 6 years of rheumatological care, around 80% of patients continuously seen were still under treatment with a conventional or biological DMARD. The highest continuation rates were seen for methotrexate monotherapy. Biologic agents were given in 2008 to 20% of patients. Of those with "severe" or "very severe" disease, 42% received biologics and 21% DMARD combination therapy. Low-dose glucocorticoids are the standard of care; of patients in rheumatological care, 88% received dosages up to 7.5 mg/d and 74% of up to 5 mg/d.

Authors: A. Zink, D. Huscher, M. Schneider

Date Published: 2010

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

AIMS: using data from the German biologics register RABBIT we investigated which gain in information can be achieved by integrating patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) into drug surveillance systems. METHODS: patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the longitudinal cohort of the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2006 who had undergone at least one follow-up were included in the study. All ADRs reported to the register either by the treating rheumatologists or the patients were coded with the same coding system (MedDRA(R)). The agreement between patients and physicians was analysed for the most frequently reported ADRs using the patient as gold standard. RESULTS: data from 4246 patients with a mean observation time of 2 years were analysed. Patients reported on average 1.2 ADRs per patient year (PY), while physicians indicated 1 ADR per PY (p<0,001). The ADR most frequently reported by patients was nausea (93.8 per 1000 PY), followed by fatigue (72.5 per 1000 PYs) and alopecia (60.6 per 1000 PYs). These ADRs were significantly less often reported by physicians. Agreement between patients and physicians was higher in more objective symptoms, such as injection site reaction (in 60.0% of cases where the patient reported this symptom, the physician did so too) or rash (53.0%), than in more subjective symptoms such as fatigue (17.4%). Agreement was highest in life-threatening events. CONCLUSIONS: patients report a higher number of ADRs than their treating physicians. Patients report subjective symptoms impacting on quality of life more frequently than physicians. Patient-physician agreement on known or clinically relevant ARDs is high. Integration of patient reports on ADRs into clinical routine could enhance the patient-physician partnership and improve compliance as well as awareness of signs and symptoms of possible ADRs.

Authors: L. Gawert, F. Hierse, A. Zink, A. Strangfeld

Date Published: 2010

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

INTRODUCTION: We used the data of the German biologics register RABBIT, a nationwide prospective cohort study, to investigate the risk of new or recurrent malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving biologics compared to conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: The analysis was based on patients with RA enrolled in RABBIT at the start of a biologic or conventional DMARD therapy between 01 May 2001 and 31 December 2006. Incidences of first or recurrent malignancies were analysed separately. A nested case-control design was used to investigate the risk of developing a first malignancy. Matching criteria were: age, gender, follow-up time, disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) at study entry, smoking status, and selected chronic co-morbid conditions (obstructive or other lung disease, kidney, liver or gastrointestinal disease, psoriasis). RESULTS: A prior malignancy was reported in 122 out of 5,120 patients. Fifty-eight of these patients had received anti-TNFalpha agents, 9 anakinra, and 55 conventional DMARDs at study entry. In 14 patients (ever exposed to anti-TNFalpha: eight, to anakinra: one) 15 recurrent cancers were observed. The average time period since the onset of the first malignancy was nine years. Crude recurrence rates per 1,000 patient-years (pyrs) were 45.5 for patients exposed to anti-TNFalpha agents, 32.3 for anakinra patients and 31.4 for patients exposed to DMARDs only (Incidence rate ratio anti-TNFalpha vs. DMARD = 1.4, P = 0.6.). In patients without prior cancer, 74 patients (70% female, mean age: 61.3) developed a first malignancy during the observation. This corresponds to an incidence rate (IR) of 6.0/1,000 pyrs. Forty-four of these patients were ever exposed to anti-TNFalpha treatment (IR = 5.1/1,000 pyrs). In a nested case-control study comparing cancer patients to cancer-free controls, 44 of the cancer patients and 44 of the cancer-free controls were ever exposed to anti-TNFalpha agents (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the overall incidence of malignancies in patients exposed or unexposed to anti-TNFalpha or anakinra treatment were found. The same applied to the risk of recurrent malignancies. However, in particular this last finding needs further validation in larger data sets.

Authors: A. Strangfeld, F. Hierse, R. Rau, G. R. Burmester, B. Krummel-Lorenz, W. Demary, J. Listing, A. Zink

Date Published: 2010

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: D. Huscher, C. Sengler, S. Ziegler, E. Gromnica-Ihle

Date Published: 2009

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To identify patterns of self-reported health problems relating to dose and duration of glucocorticoid intake in unselected patients with rheumatoid arthritis from routine practice. METHODS: Data from 1066 patients were analysed. The clinical status and drug treatment were reported by the physician, health problems during the past 6 months by the patient using a comprehensive list of symptoms. Patients with ongoing glucocorticoid treatment for more than 6 months and current doses of less than 5, 5-7.5 and over 7.5 mg/day prednisone equivalent were compared with a group without any glucocorticoid treatment for at least 12 months. RESULTS: The frequency of self-reported health problems was lowest in the group without glucocorticoid exposition and increased with dosage. Two distinct dose-related patterns of adverse events were observed. A "linear" rising with increasing dose was found for cushingoid phenotype, ecchymosis, leg oedema, mycosis, parchment-like skin, shortness of breath and sleep disturbance. A "threshold pattern" describing an elevated frequency of events beyond a certain threshold value was observed at dosages of over 7.5 mg/day for glaucoma, depression/listlessness and increase in blood pressure. Dosages of 5 mg/day or more were associated with epistaxis and weight gain. A very low threshold was seen for eye cataract (<5 mg/day). CONCLUSION: The associations found are in agreement with biological mechanisms and clinical observations. As there is a paucity of real-life data on adverse effects of glucocorticoids prescribed to unselected groups of patients, these data may help the clinician to adapt therapy with glucocorticoids accordingly and improve the benefit-risk ratio.

Authors: D. Huscher, K. Thiele, E. Gromnica-Ihle, G. Hein, W. Demary, R. Dreher, A. Zink, F. Buttgereit

Date Published: 2009

Publication Type: Journal

Powered by
(v.1.17.3)

(LDH: v0.3.4)

Copyright © 2008 - 2023 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Additions copyright ...