Publications

What is a Publication?
213 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 213
Trends in treatment and outcomes of ankylosing spondylitis in outpatient rheumatological care in Germany between 2000 and 2012

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in drug treatment and clinical outcomes of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) during the past decade. METHODS: The national database of the German collaborative arthritis centres … collects clinical and patient-derived data from unselected outpatients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Cross-sectional data from 2000 to 2012 of around 1000 patients with AS per year were compared with regard to clinical presentation and quality of life indicators. RESULTS: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the predominant treatment choice in AS over the years with a prescription rate of 67% of patients in 2012. Currently, almost half of the patients with AS in German rheumatology centres are treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Often, both treatments are used in combination (33%), followed by combinations of NSAIDs and synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) with 23% or TNFi alone (21%). In 2012, 10% of patients each received NSAID or sDMARD monotherapy. Methotrexate, sulfasalazine, glucocorticoids and analgaesics alone or in combination with other treatments were given to 10% of patients, respectively. Over the years, we have seen remarkable improvements in disease control and patient reported outcomes. These developments are consistent with enhanced functional status, increasing employment rates and decreasing sick leave, hospitalisation and work disability. CONCLUSIONS: In the German rheumatology secondary/tertiary care setting, routine care of patients with AS has changed tremendously during the past decade. Increasingly, more efficacious treatment options are reflected in improved clinical outcomes, quality of life and participation in the labour force.

Authors: D. Huscher, K. Thiele, M. Rudwaleit, K. C. Albrecht, S. Bischoff, A. Krause, K. Karberg, S. Wassenberg, A. Zink

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: Journal

Epidemiology of primary Sjogren’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological studies of primary Sjogren’s syndrome (pSS) are crucial for describing the burden to society and the public medical system and for shedding light on aetiology. Previous reports … of the epidemiology of pSS show variable outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the epidemiology of pSS to assess the prevalence rates (PRs) and incidence rates (IRs), and to investigate possible geographic variations in pSS. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase (updated to 22 October 2013) was performed to identify all published reports on the epidemiology of pSS. The incidence and prevalence rates of pSS were summarised with IRs or PRs and 95% CIs. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 1880 related citations. Only 21 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. According to a random-effects model, the pooled IR for pSS was 6.92 (95% CI 4.98 to 8.86) per 100 000 person-years. The overall PR was 60.82 (95% CI 43.69 to 77.94) cases per 100 000 inhabitants with a slightly lower estimate of Baodong Qin is BDQ, Jiaqi Wang is JQW, Zaixing Yang is ZXY, Renqian Zhong is RQZ. 43.03 (25.74 to 60.31) cases per 100 000 inhabitants when only considering population-based studies. The female/male ratio in incidence data was 9.15 (95% CI 3.35 to 13.18). The female/male ratio in prevalence data was 10.72 (95% CI 7.35 to 15.62). The overall age of pSS patients was 56.16 years (95% CI 52.54 to 59.78). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence and prevalence rates of pSS vary widely around the world. The results help us better understand the global epidemiology of pSS. Large population-based studies combining meticulous case-finding and case-ascertainment strategies are needed.

Authors: B. Qin, J. Wang, Z. Yang, M. Yang, N. Ma, F. Huang, R. Zhong

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: Journal

Patients’ Experience of Myositis and Further Validation of a Myositis-specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure - Establishing Core Domains and Expanding Patient Input on Clinical Assessment in Myositis. Report from OMERACT 12

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) myositis working group was established to examine patient-reported outcomes (PRO) as well as to validate patient-reported outcome measures … (PROM) in myositis. METHODS: Qualitative studies using focus group interviews and cognitive debriefing of the myositis-specific Myositis Activities Profile (MAP) were used to explore the experience of adults living with polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM). RESULTS: Preliminary results underscore the importance of patient input in the development of PROM to ensure content validity. Results from multicenter focus groups indicate the range of symptoms experienced including pain, fatigue, and impaired cognitive function, which are not currently assessed in myositis. Preliminary cognitive debriefing of the MAP indicated that while content was deemed relevant and important, several activities were not included; and that questionnaire construction and wording may benefit from revision. A research agenda was developed to continue work toward optimizing PRO assessment in myositis with 2 work streams. The first would continue to conduct and analyze focus groups until saturation in the thematic analysis was achieved to develop a framework that encompassed the patient-relevant aspects of myositis. The second would continue cognitive debriefing of the MAP to identify potential areas for revision. There was agreement that further work would be needed for inclusion body myositis and juvenile dermatomyositis, and that the inclusion of additional contributors such as caregivers and individuals from the pharmaceutical/regulatory spheres would be desirable. CONCLUSIONS: The currently used PROM do not assess symptoms or the effects of disease that are most important to patients; this emphasizes the necessity of patient involvement. Our work provides concrete examples for PRO identification.

Authors: M. Regardt, P. Basharat, L. Christopher-Stine, C. Sarver, A. Bjorn, I. E. Lundberg, Y. Wook Song, C. O. Bingham, H. Alexanderson

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: Journal

Health-related quality of life in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologics: data from the German biologics register RABBIT

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 24-month course of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with long-standing RA treated with a conventional synthetic (cs) or a first, second or third biologic (b) … DMARD in daily rheumatological care. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the German biologics register RABBIT who were observed over at least 12 months were stratified according to the nth bDMARD started at enrolment. HRQoL was captured by the SF36 health survey. Within strata of sequential bDMARD therapy, we examined patients’ HRQoL at baseline and at follow-ups in comparison with the general population, the 24-month course of HRQoL of different bDMARDs and the proportion of patients exceeding the minimal detectable improvement of physical and mental health sum scores. RESULTS: All patients reported remarkably lower scores of physical and mental health than the general population at baseline and month 12. In each stratum of sequential bDMARD therapy, patients improved significantly by month 12 and remained stable until month 24. The improvement of HRQoL was not attributable to a particular bDMARD. The following proportions of patients exceeded the minimal detectable improvement of at least 17.85 Physical Component Scale scores or 22.18 Mental Component Scale score points: csDMARD (n = 1113) 31.1%/22.3%, first bDMARD (n = 1352) 39.9%/29.7%, second bDMARD (n = 730) 37.3%/26.2% and third bDMARD (n = 680) 34.2%/30.9%. CONCLUSION: Lasting improvement of both physical and mental health is achievable even for severely affected RA patients with a history of more than one bDMARD failure. Nevertheless, impairment of HRQoL in RA patients is enormous compared with the general population.

Authors: K. Gerhold, A. Richter, M. Schneider, H. J. Bergerhausen, W. Demary, A. Liebhaber, J. Listing, A. Zink, A. Strangfeld

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: Journal

Mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of disease activity, treatment with glucocorticoids, TNFalpha inhibitors and rituximab

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of disease activity, the course of the disease, its treatment over time, comorbidities and traditional risk factors on survival. METHODS: Data of the German biologics … register RABBIT were used. Cox regression was applied to investigate the impact of time-varying covariates (disease activity as measured by the DAS28, functional capacity, treatment with glucocorticoids, biologic or synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)) on mortality after adjustment for age, sex, comorbid conditions and smoking. RESULTS: During 31 378 patient-years of follow-up, 463 of 8908 patients died (standardised mortality ratio: 1.49 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.63)). Patients with persistent, highly active disease (mean DAS28 > 5.1) had a significantly higher mortality risk (adjusted HR (HRadj)=2.43; (95% CI 1.64 to 3.61)) than patients with persistently low disease activity (mean DAS28 < 3.2). Poor function and treatment with glucocorticoids > 5 mg/d was significantly associated with an increased mortality, independent of disease activity. Significantly lower mortality was observed in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors (HRadj=0.64 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.81), rituximab (HRadj=0.57 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.84), or other biologics (HRadj=0.64 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.99), compared to those receiving methotrexate. To account for treatment termination in patients at risk, an HRadj for patients ever exposed to TNFalpha inhibitors or rituximab was calculated. This resulted in an HRadj of 0.77 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with long-standing high disease activity are at substantially increased risk of mortality. Effective control of disease activity decreases mortality. TNFalpha inhibitors and rituximab seem to be superior to conventional DMARDs in reducing this risk.

Authors: J. Listing, J. Kekow, B. Manger, G. R. Burmester, D. Pattloch, A. Zink, A. Strangfeld

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: Journal

[Not Available]

Abstract

Not specified

Author: A. Strangfeld

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: Journal

[How do register data support clinical decision-making?]

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: Patients in daily rheumatological care differ in their individual risk profiles from participants in randomized controlled trials (RCT), e.g. due to comorbidities and age. Transferring … results from RCTs into routine daily practice is therefore limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of observational studies for decision-making in routine rheumatology practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used data from the German biologics register RABBIT which includes patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when starting synthetic (s) or biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). They are observed for at least 5 years. Comorbidities and clinically relevant aspects (e.g. history of malignancies) are reported at baseline and adverse events at regular follow-up. RESULTS: Only one out of three patients treated with bDMARDs in RABBIT would have fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the respective pivotal study. Register data enabled developing a risk scoring model which evaluates the individual risk of a patient for serious infections depending on different risk factors and the respective DMARD treatment. Open online access to the score provides the possibility of risk estimation for all rheumatologists. Further results identified long-standing high disease activity as a dominant risk factor for a worsening of prevalent comorbidities. In patients with heart failure it was shown that effective treatment and control of disease activity with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors was more likely to be protective than harmful. CONCLUSION: Observational studies contribute essentially to the assessment of individual risks of patients. The results provide valuable information to support clinical decision-making and therefore strengthen the evidence when treating patients of higher age or with existing comorbidities.

Authors: A. Strangfeld, A. Richter

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: Journal

Powered by
 (v.1.17.3)

(LDH: v0.3.4)

About NFDI4Health | About Local Data Hub DRFZ Berlin | Partners and Funding | Credits | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Imprint
Copyright © 2008 - 2023 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Additions copyright ...